4 ms·
But the tax should be weighted. The higher the crime rate, the lower the tax rate. So now the city has to do something about crime, littering, defecation, into
by 29athrowaway 3y ago
But the tax should be weighted. The higher the crime rate, the lower the tax rate.
So now the city has to do something about crime, littering, defecation, intoxication, looting, etc. otherwise they get no money.
But that won't happen ever because the voting criteria in SF is "donkey people good, elephant people bad". The donkey people have no incentive to be competent because they take their vote for granted.
- Twixes 3y agoSounds like a great metric to game though. Undercounting crime is not far fetched at all. Such a metric needs to be maintained independently from the local government (or independently verifiable).
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]