3 ms·
Ok... I'm just taking your arguments (that you have no expectation of privacy in public) and showing you all the ways that you, personally, have an expectation
by rcme 3y ago
Ok... I'm just taking your arguments (that you have no expectation of privacy in public) and showing you all the ways that you, personally, have an expectation of privacy in public.
You have an expectation in a public shower. You have an expectation of privacy when your bits are in public. Why not in other situations?
- yosito 3y agoYou're switching the definition of public from publicly observable to publicly owned. Those are not the same thing.
- rcme 3y agoIt’s actually you who are making the distinction. The article doesn’t mention whether or not the filmed people were “in public” or whether they were only “publicly observable” (whatever that means). One of the videos I know for a fact occurred in a shopping mall, which is private property that is open to the public. I assume this means “publicly observable” in your definition. But in either case, in regards to your original comment, how did you determine these people were "in public" instead of "publicly observable"?