3 ms·
I don't really get what this article is trying to say... It seems to kind of skip over what they mean by "too busy". Are they arguing that being too occupied t
by dotnet00 3y ago
I don't really get what this article is trying to say...
It seems to kind of skip over what they mean by "too busy". Are they arguing that being too occupied to focus on another equally important task is a personal problem (which is obviously a ridiculous idea), or are they talking about people who just don't want to do something and thus pass it off as being too busy? Or is it about someone who's occupied with a task they think is more important?
Plus, all the buzzwords at the start made me think I was about to be sold a scammy self improvement course by a crypto-influencer.
- cstoner 3y agoMy takeaway from the article was that "too busy" really means "spending too much time on things that don't actually matter." Or perhaps more concretely, being too inefficient with your time.
- elcano 3y agoI'll summarize it for you: 'I'm the bomb! Just awesome. Here's the evidence. If you are a CEO looking to improve your time management and delegation skills, you can throw lots of money at me and I can coach you into being almost as good as me. This article took 1/24th days of my time. B-)'