3 ms·

I've used Gephi before and it's awesome. I can highly recommend it if you need to visualize or explore graphs, especially very large graphs which it handles gra

I've used Gephi before and it's awesome. I can highly recommend it if you need to visualize or explore graphs, especially very large graphs which it handles gracefully. That said, what's with the title for this submission -- how does the license matter much (seeing that most users are unlikely to redistribute it) and why the gratuitous Photoshop reference?

j_s 15y ago
Thanks for taking the time to critique my submission! I was excited to be able to share the project with the community since I had not seen it mentioned here before. I look forward to learning more about Gephi and plan to use it to simplify analysis of website analytics. I chose 'CDDL1/GPL3' as the most concise way to share the project's reasonable balance between 'free as in beer' and 'free as in freedom' with anyone who would already care enough to recognize the abbreviations. The recent license change is mentioned in the summary of the latest release on the front page and in the blog post: http://gephi.org/2011/gephi-0-8-beta-released/ http://gephi.org/2011/gephi-0-8-beta-released/ I felt 'The Open Graph Viz Platform' could be easily confused with http://graphviz.org http://graphviz.org and 'makes graphs handy' wasn't enough info, so I used the next prominent short description on the front page ('Like Photoshop for graphs'). Would you mind sharing the title you would recommend?