> So that fear and guilt change sides. I'm having trouble making sense of this objective. Why would anyone seek fear on either side? Is it suggested that men

> So that fear and guilt change sides. I'm having trouble making sense of this objective. Why would anyone seek fear on either side? Is it suggested that men being afraid would help women be unafraid? Or even that men must be afraid for women to be unafraid? And then the guilt. The premise is that the guilt currently lies only on the men's side. By the above statement, the signatories - all women - are seeking to move it to thier own side. I guess this statement's use of the words /fear/ and /guilt/ are in some specialist alternate meaning unknown to me. The statement would perhaps make more sense if it provided those definitions.