> You sound like someone about to perform a triple bypass with a butter knife. If climate change was a disease it wouldn't have an ICD number, no method of dia

> You sound like someone about to perform a triple bypass with a butter knife. If climate change was a disease it wouldn't have an ICD number, no method of diagnostic in standard literature, let alone a treatment approved by the competent authority. The recommended solutions would be to eat more healthy, more physical activity, and something to treat the symptoms. There won't be a double-blind study for specific treatments of earth, so any kind of idea is equally valid.