3 ms·

This is just the usual cookie banner. This is a direct URL to the image: https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Geforce-RTX-4060-Ti-16GB-Grafikkarte-279647/Specials/Tes

This is just the usual cookie banner. This is a direct URL to the image: https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Geforce-RTX-4060-Ti-16GB-Grafikkarte-279647/Specials/Test-Review-Preis-Release-8GB-vs-16GB-Specs-Benchmark-1425140/galerie/3770818/?fullsize https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Geforce-RTX-4060-Ti-16GB-Graf... Point being that a lot of current-gen AAA games already benefit from more RAM, and this is not going to get better. Consider that frame generation and raytracing also consume lots of VRAM, and FG will be essential to keep 4060Ti level silicon competitive in the future. Here is a Youtuber making the same case, that no, its not just that one badly optimized game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-j1vdMV1Cc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-j1vdMV1Cc Does this affect all games? No. But this won't help you if it affects a game you'd like to play, now or in the future.

nottorp 3y ago
> This is just the usual cookie banner. I tried passing the link through google translate and it skipped the banners unfortunately. I have a feeling it wanted me to make an account though. I uninstalled Chrome on this laptop so I can't use the in-browser translate option. > Point being that a lot of current-gen AAA games already benefit from more RAM, and this is not going to get better. Point taken. Wasn't aware of that because I get the few AAA games I'm interested in on console anyway. Most are series that started on consoles so the company is likely to be more experienced on that platform. Edit: and to be a bit snarky, I could argue that ports from console that don't take into account the amount of VRAM on common PC video cards are a case of crap console port.