5 ms·
See https://www.w3fools.com/ https://www.w3fools.com/ It's more a historical thing. Over a decade ago they were always on top, with often wrong/misleading/bad
by matsemann 3y ago
See https://www.w3fools.com/ https://www.w3fools.com/
It's more a historical thing. Over a decade ago they were always on top, with often wrong/misleading/bad practice/insecure/simplified stuff. And lots of people thought of them as some kinde official entity because of their name similarity with W3C / w3.org
It's much better now, though. But for lots of old school frontenders the reputation stuck.
- Avamander 3y agoIt still heavily lacks in quality in some areas, while making it seem like it is well-written. I just recently started blocking it.
- michaelcampbell 3y agoSomewhat the same issue as the hilariously named "experts exchange" site back in the day.