I think it's pretty clear from context that the OP meant static typing. Since he's being a dick about it, I very much understand your desire to pedantically po

I think it's pretty clear from context that the OP meant static typing. Since he's being a dick about it, I very much understand your desire to pedantically point out his error of terminology. Unfortunately, "strong" typing is a very overloaded term, which has never had a widely agreed meaning amongst either academics or practitioners. There are generally two camps: "strong" === "static", and "strong" === "no dynamic coercions", and neither is technically incorrect.