> Where does it say in the GPL, that you would be entitled to perpetual updates for every copy? I never said that it did? I'm saying that "unlimited free shit

> Where does it say in the GPL, that you would be entitled to perpetual updates for every copy? I never said that it did? I'm saying that "unlimited free shit" [0] is seemingly a direct side effect of software freedom, as the FSF has defined software freedom. I actually then went on to say that it would indeed be interesting to see a slightly less libre license that didn't anchor the use-instance price to within an epsilon of the distribution cost. So I don't really know what you're trying to argue with here. [0] actually: widespread use of libre licensed software that has been distributed to others at arm's length