>Is that what the contract says? Does it say that if a customer installs CentOS, or some RedHat downstream, that they are now in breach Nobody is arguing that

>Is that what the contract says? Does it say that if a customer installs CentOS, or some RedHat downstream, that they are now in breach Nobody is arguing that it's in breach, he's just explaining why a business motivation might exist to differentiate RHEL and RHEL-clones. It's certainly in breach of the "spirit" of the agreement in a much more direct way than the arguments people are making about the GPL.