3 ms·
Okay, first off, this is the comment you replied to: >Why can't we just start putting the CEOs of robocall companies that break the law in jail? I take it as
by LordDragonfang 3y ago
Okay, first off, this is the comment you replied to:
>Why can't we just start putting the CEOs of robocall companies that break the law in jail?
I take it as a given because it was given in the premise.
Anyway, I read the settlement proposal. There was no trial because the company waived their right to it. Because they know they're getting a slap on the wrist compared to the potential fines they could face. They're getting told they got away with all the illegal acts they previously committed (and yes, some of those things are definitely illegal), as long as they stop it now.
Imagine if someone steals hundreds of TVs, gpus, and laptops, then when they finally get caught, the courts say "Naughty naughty. We're fining you 100 dollars, but you can keep everything you stole. Now don't do it again or we'll actually punish you". It's absurd.
- Zetice 3y agoLiterally not given in the premise, and these people haven’t been convicted of anything, so your analogy is flawed (they didn’t steal or get caught doing anything).