5 ms·
Lots of news about Twitter is not a link to Twitter. Most mastodon domains don't have mastodon in the name.
by 8organicbits 3y ago
Lots of news about Twitter is not a link to Twitter. Most mastodon domains don't have mastodon in the name.
- Alupis 3y agoI don't see the difference between this and just some joe-random's blog post then. If mastodon posts come from random domains - isn't that like saying "Random Blog Post Links are more common than Twitter/X"? Mastodon probably won't ever reach critical mass like centralized Social apps do, as much as we technies might want it.
- 8organicbits 3y agoA major difference is that mastodon instances federate together, blogs don't. A rapid resurgence in self-operated blogs would also be exciting and newsworthy. > won't ever reach critical mass like centralized Social apps Is that even a goal? I use it because there's interesting people I can interact with there. Market share is not the only measure of success.
- Alupis 3y agoThe reason this particular article was submitted was to dig at Twitter/X/Musk, no? > Is that even a goal? The people pushing for Mastodon seem to have been co-opted by the anti-Twitter/Musk crowd. To them, it does appear to be a goal.
- 8organicbits 3y agoI wouldn't assume that intent and that hasn't been my experience on the platform. There was a visible uptick of Twitter discontent voiced on all platforms (including HN) at several points this year. It's easy to follow accounts that arent fixated on the old.
- rsynnott 3y agoYou could I think at one time actually have argued it for blogs; there’s a reason people used to call it the blogosphere, and social-network-esque mechanics (eg linkbacks, which likely inspired quote tweets) were commonly used at one time.
- rsynnott 3y ago“More people use email than fax” “No, that’s wrong, there are more fax messages sent than emails sent from email.com” Like, the whole _point_ of the thing is that it is not just one site. That is why it was made in the first place.