Some disputes about quality are simply differences of opinion or style. There's not really a book or standard on opinionated code quality that satisfies a majo

Some disputes about quality are simply differences of opinion or style. There's not really a book or standard on opinionated code quality that satisfies a majority of the people in the field. There's way too many ways to build things for that to exist. This leaves it up to individual teams to approach a shared consensus (with some wiggle room) within their domain and tool set. One thing that is universal is how strict the enforcement of a team's quality standards. So as a developer, you have to decide whether you like strict or lax enforcement of quality standards. Everyone can decide that but I think most don't.