3 ms·
Please don't rely on a x-twitter headline for a de-facto statement on this. Please see other threads posted here on HN. Or read Derek Lowe's response on AOH199
by adamredwoods 3y ago
Please don't rely on a x-twitter headline for a de-facto statement on this. Please see other threads posted here on HN.
Or read Derek Lowe's response on AOH1996:
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/new-mode-cancer-treatment https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/new-mode-cancer-tr...
Or read about the drug that came before it, but didn't metabolize well:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279569/
Or read about other new, interesting anti-cancer drugs:
https://med.stanford.edu/cancer/about/news/rewiring-cancer-cells-to-self-destruct.html https://med.stanford.edu/cancer/about/news/rewiring-cancer-c...
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06348-2 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06348-2
- mabbo 3y agoDerek Lowe's take is, as usual, reasonable and factual. And even he is really optimistic and happy about this result! We need some good news these days.