As he has stated ad nauseam in hearings, he has provided more compelling, classified evidence to Congress. Were he to provide that evidence publicly, he would b

As he has stated ad nauseam in hearings, he has provided more compelling, classified evidence to Congress. Were he to provide that evidence publicly, he would be committing a crime. If he lied in the recent congressional hearing, he would also be committing a crime, and could face charges of perjury and contempt of congress, as well as the end of his career. One wonders why he would do this? Most people who aren't curious about Grusch's claims haven't carefully evaluated the available information. It takes no work whatsoever to dismiss his claims based on prejudice. People are lazy.