4 ms·
I am very bullish on LK99, but it is of course with the caveat that it needs replication. I am not seeing anyone not saying that. One of the big exciting things
by ecshafer 3y ago
I am very bullish on LK99, but it is of course with the caveat that it needs replication. I am not seeing anyone not saying that. One of the big exciting things about it has been that there HAS been some replication, between simulations and science. This article is too incredulous and does get a bit of “science police” feel.
In the 1800s people were often inventing and researching in their garage labs, we need more amateur science not less.
- al_be_back 3y agoscience has advanced enormously since the 1800s. little home-made labs can't compete with billion-dollar research institutes in the hard-sciences. these guys claimed big, but their equipment couldn't generate temperatures above 127C (Celsius), basically just a bit more than a tea kettle. they seem to lack the hardware, and super-computing power required to model and simulate the molecular dynamics.