Again the fallacy. GPLv2 allow (1) giving the source code along with the binaries or (2) promise to allow any third-party to obtain those sources for the cost o

Again the fallacy. GPLv2 allow (1) giving the source code along with the binaries or (2) promise to allow any third-party to obtain those sources for the cost of copying. The Software Freedom Conservancy post shows that Red Hat considers GPL licensing to be a serious matter. Correct, an end user could not enforce a copyright violation, but the copyright owner can assign those rights. I also think Red Hat is complying with GPL and other licenses, just it is closer to the edge than last month.