>This is simply what post-peer-review looks like. No, this is a new face for peer review. Existing peer review processes have stagnated in the information ag

>This is simply what post-peer-review looks like. No, this is a new face for peer review. Existing peer review processes have stagnated in the information age, possibly with good reason. There are a lot of advantages to more immediate review of papers and data, and also to bypassing the systems of qualifications presently used to choose who is a valid reviewer.