It is not a thesis, it is a reply to your challenge of "make your own work-from-home company and compete with those complete idiots who demand going to the offi

It is not a thesis, it is a reply to your challenge of "make your own work-from-home company and compete with those complete idiots who demand going to the office, and let's see who wins." > But use you didn't simply tell me this to inform me Automattic exists and they work from home, or did you? Actually, I did! Which is why I linked to the list of other WFH companies as well. Some of them may be even competitive as well, you may check. > That somehow that's evidence that this model is good for everyone, maybe even better than other models. I never said that. You are projecting. I am fairly agnostic on the idea of which work model is best. More data needs to be collected. > They can run a company how they want, as long as it's legal. It's legal to ask your workers to come to work. If you don't like it, quit and work elsewhere, or start your own. Collective bargaining is also legal. You may call it cringe, but it is a valid mode of behavior. So what's the problem here? People are choosing to exercise an option that is legally granted to them. > But people who don't want to be abused, should leave and go work elsewhere. That's it. If you go whine to Elon, he'll fire you, and he has the right to No one disagrees that people can be fired in at-will states. But people may also choose other options besides simply taking it, or walking. You present a false dichotomy here. > If you want to cringe because I'm pointing out basics in life, such as you won't see your demands served to you on a silver plate simply because you were loud and obnoxious by "pushing back", then cringe. But you still won't get what you want. An overuse of 'cringe' is in itself cringe. Expand your vocabulary, for chrissake.