3 ms·
>20 out of 20. tbf, if you meant the full workforce it's never going to be 100%, there's so many jobs that require physical presence out of necessity. There's
by ricardo81 3y ago
>20 out of 20.
tbf, if you meant the full workforce it's never going to be 100%, there's so many jobs that require physical presence out of necessity.
There's maybe some jobs where you could also argue it's required.
Emergency surgery, police, paramedics, electricity grid maintenance, plenty jobs where there's simply no WFH angle.
I'd totally agree that personality types would also clash from WFH, so it's definitely not the definitive solution, but it works for a lot of people.