Well, if it isn’t click bait then it just means… that climatology can’t predict such events. “Winter temperatures are above 35 in South America and it is exac

Well, if it isn’t click bait then it just means… that climatology can’t predict such events. “Winter temperatures are above 35 in South America and it is exactly what climatologists predicted given our actions” — nice, they know what they are doing, they earn credibility. “Winter temperatures above 35C in South America leave climatologists in disbelief” — so something extremely unlikely happened according to your models, maybe your understanding is wrong? Or it is really an “anomaly” and things are going to get back to normal soon? The implication that something that no one has foreseen happened and, therefore, it proves that people who haven’t foreseen it were right is ridiculous.