＞ It's for both men and women. Then it goes on solely discussing male muscles, attracting women, and basically no mentions of women specificities after that. W

＞ It's for both men and women. Then it goes on solely discussing male muscles, attracting women, and basically no mentions of women specificities after that. Welp. > It's primarily for beginners, but there's plenty of science-backed advice for intermediates too. More and more "science-backed" feels like a dirty word, mostly used in grifting and fad movements. I wonder if we shouldn't get back to something more simple like "factual" or "experience-based" when referring to research results, as that's probably the meaning that we want to convey.