3 ms·
> “Christopher Nolan’s inexplicably sexless oeuvre” Oppenheimer was horny at least. The sex scenes weren’t tremendous (except maybe for Sanskrit fetishists), b
by pavlov 3y ago
> “Christopher Nolan’s inexplicably sexless oeuvre”
Oppenheimer was horny at least. The sex scenes weren’t tremendous (except maybe for Sanskrit fetishists), but at least Nolan made an effort to show how his wandering eye translated into action.
- probably_wrong 3y agoInteresting enough, I think Oppenheimer needed slightly more sex. There's a part of the movie where he's called a womanizer, yet the movie shows him having two relations (both of them serious) plus an implied flirt with a third woman. According to the biography the movie is based on [1] Oppenheimer "once had half a dozen lovers on the go". That is definitely not the impression I got from the movie. [1] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/truth-oppenheimer-cillian-murphy-christopher-nolan/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/truth-oppenheimer-cillia...
- networkchad 3y ago[dead]