3 ms·
> Meanwhile, Apple has been making a lot of noise about making the Mac a more viable gaming platform, given the exceptionally strong graphics performance (for i
by bnralt 3y ago
> Meanwhile, Apple has been making a lot of noise about making the Mac a more viable gaming platform, given the exceptionally strong graphics performance (for integrated graphics on a laptop, at least) of the M1 and M2 series chips in the latest Macs.
Mac was actually doing pretty decently for game a few years back. A pretty big chunk of the games on Steam, including many of the high profile games, were available on OSX. Dropping 32-bit support set things back immensely, however. With that one decision, Apple made the number of games available to OSX users a small fraction of the amount that was available before.
- gangstead 3y agoAgreed. I stopped using Steam and their games on Mac when all the games I had purchased stopped working. That was the end of any Mac gaming for me. I didn't have a Windows machine so I stopped using Steam completely for a few years until the Deck came out.
- jsheard 3y agoIt's probably only a matter of time before Apple drops support for OpenGL and/or x64 binaries, which would wipe out another whole chunk of Mac gaming history. PowerPC binaries are no longer usable, x86 binaries are no longer usable, I don't see why they wouldn't do it again in the name of streamlining the platform.
- als0 3y ago> x86 binaries are no longer usable What do you mean by this? Rosetta 2 is very fast and it runs a lot of x86 apps well.
- jsheard 3y agoI meant x86 as in 32-bit Intel, as opposed to x64 or x86-64 or AMD64 or whatever you want to call it. Catalina ended support for 32-bit binaries even on Intel Macs, and Rosetta2 could never run 32-bit code.
- n6h6 3y ago> or whatever you want to call it I feel for you lmao. Technology naming conventions are a shitshow, and CPU architecture is no exception.
- philistine 3y agoApple is a weird company. They are absurdly proud of Rosetta 2. It’s one of the most impressive codebase in the world. And Apple is working as hard as possible to remove it as soon as possible.
- tempodox 3y agoAnd those that are left can't be played on an Intel Mac running macOS 13, because it's become unbearably sluggish. I'm booting into 10.15 now if I want to play a game that needs more than minimal resources.
- leokennis 3y agoThat is what gaming on Mac is nowadays: paying today’s prices to play last decades’ games with last year’s performance.
- JuanPosadas 3y agoI'm surprised steam hasn't done something like proton for mac.