I'm an ML engineer working for a geospatial company and I can assure you, we are looking into this. > Satellite data is extremely idiosyncratic. It's coarse (~

I'm an ML engineer working for a geospatial company and I can assure you, we are looking into this. > Satellite data is extremely idiosyncratic. It's coarse (~10m at best) 10m is the best free imagery, in the commercial domain it goes down to 30cm. > Well, at least no one cares that will actually pay you. There are plenty of things people will pay you for. But you gotta find those niches. > In other words, this might be an interesting announcement for scientists, but it won't change the geospatial market at all. Maybe, we'll definitely check if it can be fine-tuned on higher res data. We do sometimes use Sentinel-2 (not a lot though), but can help with those cases.