4 ms·
Yeah, that’s a pretty genius idea. I’d be totally supportive of anyone who wanted to pursue something like that. I just don’t think that seeking treatment like
by nocoiner 3y ago
Yeah, that’s a pretty genius idea. I’d be totally supportive of anyone who wanted to pursue something like that. I just don’t think that seeking treatment like that overlaps very much with the FDA’s role and mandate.
Not to say FDA doesn’t need to be reformed; it probably does. But I don’t think mindless sclerosis is what’s taking time to evaluate new drugs.
- noduerme 3y agoOkay, this is me thinking with my "I'm going to die, therefore money and propriety are no object" cap: Who gives a fuck what one agency chooses to bless or not bless, if you're going to die? Go where you can get treatment, even if you have to go into debt to do it. This is just one country, one agency. The information itself is available. If you're staying in American and railing against the FDA, while dying, you're not making the best use of your time. We should proceed from the basic assumption that - with enough money - you can get any drug you want synthesized and professionally administered. Then, maybe, we should question why the FDA is slow to release them. It's a big world, and nothing is stopping anyone from experimenting on themselves, if they have the wherewithal to print what they want to inject. I'm not saying this guy has the wherewithal. But it's not the FDA that's the problem as much as the 101 fake miracle cures cooked up by seductive pseudo-scientists that the FDA is constantly doing yeoman's service to dispel. Rather than rail against regulation, go somewhere unregulated. That's the beauty of living in a big, messed up world.