4 ms·
> makes more economic sense to have fewer, central owners that can maximize usage What you have described is effectively a China-style ICP license[1]. Unless y
by mike_d 3y ago
> makes more economic sense to have fewer, central owners that can maximize usage
What you have described is effectively a China-style ICP license[1]. Unless you are willing to give a big name cloud provider $x per month, you shouldn't be able to put a service on the internet?
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICP_license https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICP_license
- ripdog 3y agoOnly on legacy IP. We're trying to kill it. A bit of pain will be necessary to finally get modern IP across the line of mainstream usage.
- mike_d 3y ago"We" are not doing anything of the sort. 11 years into IPv6 and you still can't single home a network behind v6. Much like DNSSEC the purists refuse to admit that it has basically been a failure outside of very specific use cases.