3 ms·
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LK-99#Replication_attempts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LK-99#Replication_attempts This Wikipedia article has a good summary of
by bobmaxup 3y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LK-99#Replication_attempts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LK-99#Replication_attempts
This Wikipedia article has a good summary of the replication attempts to date (including this paper).
- someplaceguy 3y agoReading further below, I'm actually amazed by all the theoretical studies that have already been done from first principles (all apparently supporting the possibility of superconductivity). That's a pretty fast pace for science!
- seydor 3y agoBut have they asked chatgpt?
- awb 3y agoMagnus Carlson said that if you tell him there’s a winning move on a chess board he could find it very quickly, because his focus becomes extremely narrow. I wonder if something similar is happening here. Since the scope was defined as LK-99, it becomes a narrow query instead of a broad one.
- Sharlin 3y agoThis is not just telling someone there's a winning move. It's telling them that X is a winning move and they just have to verify that X is indeed one. Many, many problems are such that it's difficult to find a solution but easy to verify one.
- XnoiVeX 3y agoI know nothing about this but I stay curious. Just like Navier-Stokes equations can be proved with numerical approximations, can this be verified even if we never solve it?
- awb 3y agoTrue, but in this instance it’s my understanding that there were still some areas of guesswork where the paper wasn’t clear.