5 ms·
And because the impact is exponentially larger. Arguments for regulation prohibiting individuals from tinkering with their cars does no such thing, because tho
by omginternets 3y ago
And because the impact is exponentially larger. Arguments for regulation prohibiting individuals from tinkering with their cars does no such thing, because those laws are not currently in place, and there is not an epidemic of runaway user-modified vehicles.
On the other hand, such regulation would serve to prevent users from enjoying the property they purchased and to facilitate exploitative practices by manufacturers and retailers. It is all the more absurd given that existing law already provides mechanisms for deterrence and punishment, namely: the notion of negligence.
I cannot stress how terrible this idea is. This would severely degrade consumer rights and do virtually nothing to protect people.
- jabradoodle 3y agoIt really depends what you are modifying. By all means have a custom entertainment system and I detest the software locked features such as heated seats. If you are messing with safety critical software then it is no help to me that you are prosecuted for negligence if I am killed. Even if your safety critical software works it still is negligent, there should be some barrier to entry for such software. It shouldn't be out there in the wild made by whoever with no oversight.
- omginternets 3y agoDo you think you should be allowed to change your brake pads? How about bleed your brake lines?
- jabradoodle 3y agoYes, I would trust people to generally be competent enough. Writing your own self driving software, go ahead, as long as your driving on private land I have no issue.
- omginternets 3y agoBut nobody is writing self-driving software. They are jail breaking the existing software.
- jabradoodle 3y agoThere is someone posting about exactly that on this post. https://github.com/d4l3k/torchdrive https://github.com/d4l3k/torchdrive