p-values aren't problematic. How people use them is. Same with bayes factors. I've seen people claim "anything above 3 is significant". Incidentally, the theo

p-values aren't problematic. How people use them is. Same with bayes factors. I've seen people claim "anything above 3 is significant". Incidentally, the theory behind p-values is actually beautiful, and p-values can generalise really well in theory, but in practice most people don't know this. E.g., did you know that you can have "bayesian" p-values? (in the sense that the p-value can be designed to take priors and other models into account, without violating its definition in any way)