3 ms·
Addresses were already being charged if they weren't attached to an interface. Increase that charge if you're looking to churn unused IP addresses.
by mark242 3y ago
Addresses were already being charged if they weren't attached to an interface. Increase that charge if you're looking to churn unused IP addresses.
- jeremyjh 3y agoThat would not catch every public IP address that is actually unused, because it can be attached to an interface and yet not be needed or actually used by any client. But I don't agree with GP that this is an important reason for the price increase. They are increasing prices simply because costs have increased.
- mark242 3y agoAnything that an IP address can be attached to is already accumulating a charge, just by existing and running. EC2, NAT gateway, ELB, etc. What's "actually unused" then? Minimum amount of traffic? I don't think it's in Amazon's purview to make those judgement calls.
- jeremyjh 3y agoWhat I meant by unused is that there might not be a client that ever connects to that IP address, so the public IP address itself might not be used even if its attached to a resource. > I don't think it's in Amazon's purview to make those judgement calls. I already said I don't agree with GP that this is a motive for Amazon.