> Unfortunately the OP's attitude of solely antipathy towards the Muslim role in India's history... You clearly did not understand the intention of what I post

> Unfortunately the OP's attitude of solely antipathy towards the Muslim role in India's history... You clearly did not understand the intention of what I posted (criticism of the anti-Western attitude at the British Library), instead insisting on a perceived antipathy towards Muslims. If you follow the link I added the first thing you see is an explanation of how the page is not too be taken as criticism of a single religion. Read it again and you might understand what I wrote and why. Don't forget to read the last few paragraphs which give context to what is written. All that said I do consider it important that this part of history is not shovelled under the carpet just to appease a vocal group, especially not seen in the context of the constant stream of criticism of Western colonialism which tries to portray this as a specifically Western vice