It's silly, just like the "Inuit own nunavut" may be true on a technicality but it's pointless. The King is our head of state and through the legal concept of

It's silly, just like the "Inuit own nunavut" may be true on a technicality but it's pointless. The King is our head of state and through the legal concept of the Crown may technically be the "owner" but in fact they're controlled by the elected government. Likewise the nunavut land (which is effectively uninhabitable arctic) would be governed by whatever self government they have, but you might as well say the citizens of the US own all federal land. I thought adding these made the list look silly, they should have stuck with ownership as it's commonly understood. In which case I suppose it would have been just Australian ranchers.