> The problem is getting people to use that modern tooling, even static analysis is hardly used and lint was created in 1979 Maybe; rest to see if using modern

> The problem is getting people to use that modern tooling, even static analysis is hardly used and lint was created in 1979 Maybe; rest to see if using modern tooling is easier or harder on the average programmer than learning a new language. > This is what memory safe systems languages offer, there is no way around avoiding such tooling, it is part of the language and needs to be explicitly disabled. The programming language is just one part of the chain. The goal is to detect/prevent bad code pattern and address them. There is no rules about this happening at the language level.