4 ms·
Well, the state is also people, so state-owned is also private people owning it then. Either that, or you could acknowledge the dramatic material differences be
by digging 3y ago
Well, the state is also people, so state-owned is also private people owning it then. Either that, or you could acknowledge the dramatic material differences between workers owning their own output and a rich individual not-worker owning their output.
- robertlagrant 3y agoEr no, people don't own the state. People do own businesses.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago> so state-owned is also private people owning it This is wrong by definition. There is an actual "true" dichotomy between public ownership and non-public ownership. Two criteria: - "jointly exhaustive": the two subsets contain all possible scenarios - "mutually exclusive": the two subsets do not share any possible scenarios These criteria are met with the subsets of "the state" (meaning "public") and "private people" (meaning "non-public").