4 ms·
For different definitions of "liability?" Losing access to media sorta sucks, but is honestly not that big of a deal for the vast majority of it folks have. C
by taeric 3y ago
For different definitions of "liability?" Losing access to media sorta sucks, but is honestly not that big of a deal for the vast majority of it folks have.
Consider that the vast majority of consumed media forever has been radio and broadcast/cable. And until very recently, you either saw the show live, or you missed it. Really isn't much different and you don't typically feel a loss that you can't watch last year's show.
Same goes for newspapers or any other physical thing you can get delivered. I have some magazines that I do keep in good condition as they made me happy to have them on a book shelf. I cannot justify that in any way that doesn't ultimately lead to hoarding, though. I think these should be available and preserved, but I see little benefit in having everyone preserve their own movie collection.
To get sad on it, go look at any estate sale and see how many VHS tapes many older generations collected.
- YurgenJurgensen 3y agoWho is doing the preservation in your world if not 'everyone'? Every individual party has things they'd rather not exist, so the only way to ensure media is preserved is to just make lots of copies among lots of parties.
- taeric 3y agoI appreciate the idea, but I assure you that the vast majority of media that people hold on to are tossed when they die. To that end, I'm very much in favor of enabling and strengthening libraries. Note that I'm also not against letting people build up these collections. I don't share in the romanticizing of building up giant collections of media that you still don't own. Yes, you can sell the media to someone else. No, you don't have any real ownership of the story or contents. And with how hard preserving digital media actually is, few are doing a good job preserving those.