>even this particular company is well known for not following the duty of making the most money for its holders The selling of a company doesn't exactly fall i

>even this particular company is well known for not following the duty of making the most money for its holders The selling of a company doesn't exactly fall into maximization of shareholder profits: it depends on a couple things. The board of a company has no obligation to maximize it's short term value. Otherwise, anytime someone is offered a profitable buyout and turns it down they would violating their social responsibilities. I could be wrong, but I had a similar discussion with a close friend who is a big dog in the world of finance and that's the message I got from him. Here's some relevant info: >The role of such statutes is especially important in light of the QVC decision, which prohibits directors from simply approving a strategic merger based on their business judgment that the transaction provides more value in the long term. http://apps.americanbar.org/buslaw/blt/8-3shareholders.html http://apps.americanbar.org/buslaw/blt/8-3shareholders.html Also, you may be interested in this. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/executive-adviser/2010-3/5231/the-case-against-corporate-social-responsibility/ http://sloanreview.mit.edu/executive-adviser/2010-3/5231/the...