> I assume they were "attacking" (as in disagreeing with?) the belief sets of Scott Aaronson and Scott Alexander as outlined in their blogs? You assume wrong.

> I assume they were "attacking" (as in disagreeing with?) the belief sets of Scott Aaronson and Scott Alexander as outlined in their blogs? You assume wrong. The NYTimes article on Scott Alexander (I haven't read the one on Scott Aaronson) attacked his character in addition to his beliefs. Oh, and they doxxed him, which is categorically different than pointing out that RationalWiki does profiling and ad-hominem attacks.