2 ms·

1. Judges don't order an "antitrust" case, a prosecutor must do that start a case. A judge can then rule on it OR a jury (the DOJ in fact requested an anti-trus

1. Judges don't order an "antitrust" case, a prosecutor must do that start a case. A judge can then rule on it OR a jury (the DOJ in fact requested an anti-trust jury trial this year) 2. Your theory was basically proven broke by the fact that ATT which was broken up in anti-trust, became ATT, again.

pyrale 3y ago
> A judge can then rule on it And the result of a ruling is a court order to do something. Sure, "ordering an antitrust" is a bit less precise than "ordering a series of actions that result from a successful antitrust prosecution", but I was hoping it to be clear enough. My point was that judge do issue orders, and they really don't like people finessing around the wording.