3 ms·
This is more than a nitpick. If you want to define static in a way not implied by common usage, you could say that even a blank piece of paper is not static bec
by lukevp 3y ago
This is more than a nitpick. If you want to define static in a way not implied by common usage, you could say that even a blank piece of paper is not static because it’s made of atoms, or orbiting the sun, or whatever. They clearly meant static in the sense that it’s not a video.
- nico 3y agoNo one intended redefining static, just pointing out that a photograph is most definitely not static And as you point out, everything in the universe is moving, which is actually a big deal that we don’t consider nearly enough, and which we tend to completely dismiss as if it was the most obvious thing in the world, like you are doing with your comment