4 ms·
ELI5, if these folks confirmed zero resistance at room temp and atmospheric pressure, isn't that confirmation of the original paper? Edit: I read 100 K as 100°
by elromulous 3y ago
ELI5, if these folks confirmed zero resistance at room temp and atmospheric pressure, isn't that confirmation of the original paper?
Edit: I read 100 K as 100°c. Mea culpa.
- mcqueenjordan 3y ago100 degrees kelvin is about 338 degrees Fahrenheit below room temperature.
- elromulous 3y agoDuh. Thanks. I think my brain must have transposed that K to C.
- mcqueenjordan 3y agoI also did that the first time when reading the abstract. Very relatable. "It's on the front page of HN, so it must be a remarkable result," my subconscious seemed to assume on my behalf. ;) Fool me once...
- matsemann 3y agoThanks for making it even more confusing by introducing Fahrenheit, haha. ;)