2 ms·
In my opinion this is different. As I see it, in your example, this would be suing an app maker for the closed down app store. In OPs example Google is providi
by Dah00n 3y ago
In my opinion this is different. As I see it, in your example, this would be suing an app maker for the closed down app store.
In OPs example Google is providing a feature, that you can use or not freely, then the bank dicided to use it. The problem is of course Google providing it but it is the bank that close down their site for non-chrome users, not Google.
- EMIRELADERO 3y agoLegislatively speaking at least, it has a simple solution. Make it illegal for entities above a certain size to refuse service to users based on the status/control of the devices used to access them.