I don't have any desire to carry water for this horrible concept but "Google is too important" is awfully abstract to run a campaign on. We're at the level whe

I don't have any desire to carry water for this horrible concept but "Google is too important" is awfully abstract to run a campaign on. We're at the level where "does it break end-to-end encryption without anyone else being technically capable of reading it" is a serious debate. Why does this technical proposal actually threaten them or their constituents in a concrete way? More importantly, does it threaten a politician's ability to fundraise or broadcast the message they like? I think the idea is horrific on many ethical and technical grounds, but how can Google directly use it to ruin a [political] career? That feels like more what they will empathize with.