3 ms·
Honestly I don't understand how any company can rely on Microsoft for security, and how they can get away with blaming their customers so often. You can litera
by cookiengineer 3y ago
Honestly I don't understand how any company can rely on Microsoft for security, and how they can get away with blaming their customers so often.
You can literally kerberoast Azure AD by default, and that's a known to be used in the wild attack vector since 2014. In a cloud service. Today.
Spammers literally rent Azure VMs because they know that the IP range of azure is not processed by Outlooks/Exchanges email filters.
So often researchers did the right thing and disclosed everything correctly just to get Microsoft to say "oh yeah here is another RCE, but we don't give a damn. Oh, and there is no patch either."
It's just so ridiculous.
There's even unfixed RCEs of VBA from the Office 2013 days which still work, because the mentality of never touch a running software creeped into how Office is built (which is: have a literal copy of all outdated Office versions for the sake of compatibility).
And then people wonder why "Hackers" always say that Microsoft is insecure and why ISO27001 is now a google dork to find easy to hack victims.
- dhab 3y agoI am compiling these as a case against adoption of Microsoft Can anyone provide references for these proving their current existence?