4 ms·
The difference is that for the average Polander, cutting 10% of their income means substantial significantly less purchasing power without lots to gain.
by PartiallyTyped 3y ago
The difference is that for the average Polander, cutting 10% of their income means substantial significantly less purchasing power without lots to gain.
- hsjqllzlfkf 3y agoWhat do you mean, without lots to gain? You were just arguing that the shareholders were gonna benefit so much from new productivity gains. I don't get your obsession with Poland. It's a country I have a soft spot for, even though it's not my country of origin, but most importantly my argument is entirely orthogonal to that.