> That’s why X has filed a legal claim against the CCDH and its backers. CCDH has published the letter they received from Twitter, as well as their response:

> That’s why X has filed a legal claim against the CCDH and its backers. CCDH has published the letter they received from Twitter, as well as their response: https://counterhate.com/blog/letters-from-the-lawyers-musk-threatens-ccdh-with-brazen-attempt-to-silence-honest-criticism/ https://counterhate.com/blog/letters-from-the-lawyers-musk-t... the "legal claim" language Twitter uses here doesn't make it particularly clear, as far as I can tell it's only that cease & desist letter, and not a lawsuit (yet) here is the report that Twitter is objecting to: https://counterhate.com/research/twitter-fails-to-act-on-twitter-blue-accounts-tweeting-hate/ https://counterhate.com/research/twitter-fails-to-act-on-twi... > Researchers collected tweets promoting hate from 100 Twitter Blue subscribers. The tweets were reported to the platform using Twitter’s own tools for flagging hateful conduct. > Four days after reporting the tweets, researchers found that Twitter had failed to act on 99% of the posts and 100% of the accounts remained active. In the one instance that Twitter removed a hateful tweet, the account from which it was tweeted remains active.