3 ms·
The claim was "purely civilian," which was false. End of.
by Robotbeat 3y ago
The claim was "purely civilian," which was false. End of.
- hef19898 3y agoBy that time, 1945, no city, or town, of any of the beligerents was "purely" civilian anymore. Doesn't excuse the deliberate killong of hundreds of thousands of non-combatants so.
- Robotbeat 3y agoI’m not. One of the criteria was that it had to have at least SOME military significance.
- DiogenesKynikos 3y agoIt was as close to "purely civilian" as anything could get. A large city with no particular military value, whose urban center was explicitly targeted (rather than any particular industrial site).