3 ms·
To me, SSN is enough to personally identify. Additional information would be redundant for that purpose. Of course, if any information is misused, that’s ille
by onesphere 3y ago
To me, SSN is enough to personally identify. Additional information would be redundant for that purpose. Of course, if any information is misused, that’s illegal. And it’s not a lot of money for them to steal back, unless it’s about labor control. But again, that’s illegal.
In the US, what incorporates the existence of federal government power is that there is somebody to mandate it, and this is represented by capital/property/enforcement/vote. Those that are enfranchised with property (like money) are legally recognized as invested in upholding the agreement of union: then the law, and hence their stake, survives. You’re trusted to do business, run for office, make new laws, etc. You can make systems that persist or harden the fairness of a law.
By enfranchising people worldwide, you’re giving them a stake. Enforcement, however, is the hard part. Is this coin rigorous enough? Is it stable? What’s the jurisdiction?