5 ms·
High Dynamic Time Range Images (2006)
- aendruk 3y agoGetting a status 500 from Squid. Mirror: https://web.archive.org/web/20230802225102/http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/fun/hdtr/ https://web.archive.org/web/20230802225102/http://mkweb.bcgs...
- 7373737373 3y agoLooks like this could be a browser problem?
- erksa 3y agoLove this type of composite photography, really gives a fun perspective of a location.
- rubyn00bie 3y agoThis is awesome. Is there a version of this, or something similar, not using Perl? I have nothing against Perl other than I’m absolutely shit at it and have zero incentive to get better (except maybe playing with this).
- saladdressing 3y ago[dead]
- OO000oo 3y agoWhy?
- esafak 3y agoSo you can show the passage of time in one image.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- esafak 3y ago(2006)
- taneq 3y agoFor landscapes these are great. For action shots I’m a fan of the long-exposure-plus-flash approach where you get a sharp freeze frame overlaid on the motion blur showing the movement.
- adrenvi 3y agoIt would be interesting to see this concept extended into time-lapse video. The day/night segments of the video could shift to the right with the passage of time.
- mazzystar 3y agoI think it won't move. As the segment is extracted by current time, it's somehow similar to record a video from day to night. Tell me if I'm wrong.
- ioedward 3y agoRelated: 1 year represented in a photo. https://eirikso.com/2011/01/04/one-year-in-one-image/ https://eirikso.com/2011/01/04/one-year-in-one-image/
- nico 3y agoThis is really really cool One nitpick: > a photograph, an inherently static medium At least on a computer screen, it is far from static Just displaying a photograph requires looping through the whole thing multiple times per second, both to refresh the display and to draw the image And even a static photograph usually contains enough time information to be compressed quite a bit
- lukevp 3y agoThis is more than a nitpick. If you want to define static in a way not implied by common usage, you could say that even a blank piece of paper is not static because it’s made of atoms, or orbiting the sun, or whatever. They clearly meant static in the sense that it’s not a video.
- nico 3y agoNo one intended redefining static, just pointing out that a photograph is most definitely not static And as you point out, everything in the universe is moving, which is actually a big deal that we don’t consider nearly enough, and which we tend to completely dismiss as if it was the most obvious thing in the world, like you are doing with your comment
- flobosg 3y agoSomewhat related – This comment from a few months ago about stitching images of passing trains: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35738987 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35738987
- 7373737373 3y agoNot the same concept, but in terms of extremely long exposures I love these images too: http://itchyi.squarespace.com/thelatest/2010/7/20/the-longest-photographic-exposures-in-history.html http://itchyi.squarespace.com/thelatest/2010/7/20/the-longes... http://xyzon.nl/solargraphy/ http://xyzon.nl/solargraphy/ https://rankinstudio.com/astronomy https://rankinstudio.com/astronomy
- mynameisash 3y agoI'm actually working on my own implementation[0] as a standalone binary to avoid dealing with Perl and its dependencies and as a collaboration with my nephew, who is learning new photography styles and techniques. [0] https://github.com/aeshirey/hdtr https://github.com/aeshirey/hdtr